When market-leading SaaS becomes the bottleneck
During the founding phase, several cloud services enabled a fast start. As the business grew, distributed data and costly custom workflows increasingly became a problem.
When standard software slows down your workflows, locks away your data or lacks a crucial capability, I build the solution that fits — aligned with your processes, connected to your existing systems and controlled from a bounded pilot through to production.
The individual advantage
Where standard software ends, your process should not have to.
Custom software is not an end in itself. It creates value where an important difference for your business emerges:
Employees compensate for what existing software cannot represent — with spreadsheets, duplicate entry and manual work.
Despite existing systems, status, KPIs and forecasts are rebuilt manually in spreadsheets — often with formulas that are difficult to verify.
A new service, internal tool or digital product needs to fit your specific business model.
Project ownership for
25+ years of experienceSMB to enterpriseOwnership through operations
In most companies, time is lost every day in places nobody questions anymore:
Employees type the same information into multiple systems — from the email into the spreadsheet, from the spreadsheet into the order system.
Part of it sits in inboxes, part in spreadsheets, part in individual colleagues' heads. Whoever needs something asks around.
The same requests, the same answers — every day, written by hand.
What your company knows lives in PDFs, folders, and manuals — instead of where the work actually happens.
What you might not see yet
The most expensive problems never appear in any statistic:
New employees need weeks to figure out how things work — because processes only exist in heads and scattered folders. You become productive by asking around long enough.
Typical signal“You'll pick it up over time.”
Revenue, delivery volumes, utilisation or other KPIA key metric used to measure performance, progress or target achievement in a business area. are assembled in manually maintained spreadsheets. Formulas and definitions change, results are difficult to verify, and often only one person understands how the displayed status was produced.
Typical signal“Which number is actually correct?”
Whoever asks in the evening and hears nothing by noon buys from your competitor. These lost orders never show up anywhere — customers don't call to say goodbye.
Typical signalInquiry at 9:14 pm — first reply the next day
Which products perform? Which customers churn? Where does the process jam? The answers are already in your systems — yet decisions are made by gut feeling.
Typical signal“We go by feel.”
More software does not solve this automatically. What matters is where the workflow actually loses time, money or reliability — only then does a targeted solution pay off.
What I can build specifically for your business.
The starting point is not a product catalogue but a business bottleneck. These examples show the outcome and the capabilities I can implement to achieve it — tailored to your workflows, systems, data and responsibilities.
Business applications, portals and digital products
Tailored to your business
Interfaces, roles, rules and exceptions follow the way your business actually works. The result is not another generic package, but a tool built for your operation.
What I can implement
When standard software cannot represent an important workflow cleanly
Integration and process automation
Tailored to your business
Existing applications stay in place where they work. I connect the gaps between them and automate recurring handovers, including checks, approvals and exceptions.
What I can implement
When employees currently act as the interface between applications
Data platforms, dashboards and gradual SaaS replacement
Tailored to your business
Distributed operational data becomes a shared basis for decisions. KPIA key metric used to measure performance, progress or target achievement in a business area. are calculated centrally according to agreed rules, visualised for the business and complemented by visible data-quality indicators.
What I can implement
When the data exists but decisions still depend on manually maintained spreadsheet reports
Secure AI integration and assistance systems
Tailored to your business
Knowledge sources, permissions, conversations and handovers are configured around your business. AI receives clearly bounded responsibilities instead of uncontrolled authority.
What I can implement
When AI should create clear value without sacrificing security and control
Anonymised example from practice
Which of your customers ends up costing you money? Does the large order still pay off once overtime and a temporary hire are part of it?
One view
status, targets and capacity in one place
Warned early
signals while there is still time to turn them
Separate what you control
controllable losses, told apart from the rest
Based on a real project pattern · anonymised · figures shown are fictional
Three files, three versions — and every Monday a fourth one is built from them.
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montage | 1.240 | 1.180 | 96% | ||
| 2 | Service | 860 | 742 | 86% | – | |
| 3 | Vertrieb | 1.020 | 806 | 79% | ||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Summe | 3.120 | 2.728 | |||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | Stand | 14.08. |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montage | 1.240 | 1.180 | 96% | ||
| 2 | Service | 860 | 742 | 86% | – | |
| 3 | Vertrieb | 1.020 | 806 | 79% | ||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Summe | 3.120 | 2.728 | |||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | Stand | 14.08. |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montage | 1.240 | 1.180 | 96% | ||
| 2 | Service | 860 | 742 | 86% | – | |
| 3 | Vertrieb | 1.020 | #REF! | 79% | ||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Summe | 3.120 | 2.728 | |||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | Stand | 14.08. |
Sent 22:41 · followed by "use the other one instead"
Three files, from which a fourth is built every Monday.
Key figures · Sample Company Ltd
45 employees · three sources · as of 06:12 today
Shortfall since May · gap widening monthly
Plan and actual across the year
| Month | Plan | Actual | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 52 | 54 | 2 |
| Feb | 56 | 58 | 2 |
| Mar | 60 | 61 | 1 |
| Apr | 64 | 64 | 0 |
| May | 68 | 62 | -6 |
| Jun | 72 | 58 | -14 |
| Jul | 76 | 53 | -23 |
| Aug | 80 | 48 | -32 |
April was the last month on plan.
Monthly figures · contribution margin, thousands · time tracking + accounting
Where it comes from
Two orders are waiting for an unambiguous assignment. The calculation stays usable, and the note stays visible.
What needs a decision now
Once the figures sit in one place, what gut feeling answers today becomes calculable — that an additional position lowers the result in its first year, for instance, while five per cent on the price list raises it by a third.
Something like this grows out of the sources a company already has.
Your business no longer has to bend around the software.
Standard software makes sense while it supports the way your business works. It becomes expensive when employees create workarounds, maintain data several times or need another module for every necessary change. Proven components and AI-assisted development now make it possible to close these gaps selectively — without automatically turning the work into a multi-year programme.
A real-world example
A business runs the software of an established industry vendor. But to analyze its own customer data — or connect it to other systems — it has to buy expensive add-on modules, or pay extra for every APIA clearly defined interface through which systems exchange data and securely call functions. call. The data belongs to the business; access to it belongs to the vendor. A tailored solution flips that around: your data, interfaces, and decisions stay with you — with no surcharge to reach what's already yours.
Investment framework
The effort depends on interfaces, rules and the operating model — not on the name of the solution. After the free introductory call, you receive a concrete proposal with a clearly defined scope instead of a low entry price that grows through add-on modules later.
Tailored does not mean reinventing everything: proven open-source components and AI-assisted development keep effort and time-to-value manageable.
First we establish the value. Then we build exactly the solution that delivers it in day-to-day work:
You show me where time is lost, errors occur or customers wait today. I put the workflow into context and define a concrete goal with you — clear and measurable.
You receive an honest assessment of what improvement is realistic, what it will cost and where implementation is not worthwhile — before a larger budget is committed.
I develop the solution, connect it to your existing applications and support the rollout. Automation and AI are used where they reliably deliver the agreed value.
You speak with the person who understands the workflow, designs the solution and implements it. Decisions do not get lost between sales, project management and development.
More than 25 years of international enterprise and mid-market experience also shape smaller solutions — so they can be operated, extended and handed over safely.
Modern development tools shorten the path from a decision to a usable result. Your budget goes into the solution rather than internal handovers and large project structures.
The solution is documented and built transparently. Your team or another provider can operate and extend it — without creating a new dependency on me.
Knowledge about your workflows and decisions is retained. After launch, you still speak with the same contact instead of onboarding a new team every time.
I handle software and automation myself. For infrastructure or other specialist areas, I work with your existing partner or a vetted expert such as Matthias Simon — targeted support instead of a permanent large team.
m-simon.comNot every problem starts with spreadsheets. Custom software also creates value where standard products slow down important workflows, limit data sovereignty or make necessary changes disproportionately expensive.
During the founding phase, several cloud services enabled a fast start. As the business grew, distributed data and costly custom workflows increasingly became a problem.
Orders, customer data or appointments are copied from emails into spreadsheets, calendars and specialist software. The applications work — but the workflow between them remains manual, error-prone and dependent on individual employees.
The concern is understandable: high initial effort, months of development and an outcome that can only be assessed very late.
Commissioning custom software means handing over more than requirements: it means entrusting someone with important operations. Clear communication, sound decisions and reliable delivery therefore matter just as much as the technology.
Tell me what is not working today or what you want to create. You will receive an honest assessment of the sensible path forward and what to expect.